Understanding what the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2007 tells us

Getting to grips early with the Indices of Deprivation 2007 is critical – GOs will want to see evidence of analysis in LAA refreshes, and communities, local members and other stakeholders will want evidence on how programmes are delivering locally.

Key questions that partners should be thinking about include:

  • Are we closing the gap against the country / region? Are our most deprived areas closing the gap against the LA as a whole? Do the IMD and domains show any (indirect) evidence of the impact of local programmes.
  • What is the likely impact on future funding streams? How have local deprivation levels changed relative to the national or regional perspective? Are we likely to gain or lose funding from regional or national pots?
  • How do local priorities match-up with the latest evidence? Have priority areas got better? Do the Indices highlight areas that we haven’t previously focused on?

As there is little change in the methodology from the Indices of Deprivation 2004, direct comparisons can (and should!) be made.

For further information, contact Tom Smith on Tom.Smith@ocsi.co.uk or 01273 201 345.

Author


Featured posts

Decorative image with the text "Community Needs Index"

Uncategorized

Community Needs Index 2023 now available as open data

The English Community Needs Index (CNI) 2023 is now published as open…
More

Resources and data

Place-based intelligence and decision making in social housing

Social housing providers have deep, experience-based knowledge of the communities they serve….
More

Resources and data

How to check if a building is located in an area with high deprivation and community need

Many funding programmes use the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) to identify…
More

Case studies
Data analysis
Featured
Indices of Deprivation
Key facts and insights
left behind neighbourhoods
OCSI news
Research Projects
Resources and data
Uncategorized