Understanding what the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2007 tells us

Getting to grips early with the Indices of Deprivation 2007 is critical – GOs will want to see evidence of analysis in LAA refreshes, and communities, local members and other stakeholders will want evidence on how programmes are delivering locally.

Key questions that partners should be thinking about include:

  • Are we closing the gap against the country / region? Are our most deprived areas closing the gap against the LA as a whole? Do the IMD and domains show any (indirect) evidence of the impact of local programmes.
  • What is the likely impact on future funding streams? How have local deprivation levels changed relative to the national or regional perspective? Are we likely to gain or lose funding from regional or national pots?
  • How do local priorities match-up with the latest evidence? Have priority areas got better? Do the Indices highlight areas that we haven’t previously focused on?

As there is little change in the methodology from the Indices of Deprivation 2004, direct comparisons can (and should!) be made.

For further information, contact Tom Smith on Tom.Smith@ocsi.co.uk or 01273 201 345.

Author


Featured posts

Research project: developing a measure of hyper-local need

Research Projects

Developing a measure of Hyper-local Need: neighbourhood level data to inform Labour’s key missions

The Independent Commission on Neighbourhoods (ICON) was created in September to examine…
More

Resources and data

The importance of mid-year population estimates

For organisations working to address social challenges, like Community Foundations, understanding who…
More

Data analysis

Data Heroes: Tim Berners-Lee

At OCSI, we use open data to drive social good, turning complex…
More

Case studies
Data analysis
Featured
Indices of Deprivation
left behind neighbourhoods
OCSI news
Research Projects
Resources and data
Uncategorized