What the Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation (WIMD) 2025 reveals about inequality across Wales

The Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation (WIMD) is the official measure of relative deprivation in Wales, widely used to understand inequality and target resources at a local level. The latest release provides an updated picture of how deprivation is distributed across Welsh communities and how this has changed over time.

Using the new WIMD 2025 data alongside analysis in Local Insight, this blog explores three key questions: 

  • Where does deprivation remain most entrenched?
  •  How do patterns differ across unitary authorities? 
  • Where are new pressures emerging?

While many of the most deprived neighbourhoods in Wales remain unchanged, the latest data also highlights areas where relative deprivation has deepened – often in places already under pressure.

Note: Any changes in relative deprivation between 2025 and previous Indices should be considered in the context of the changes to the methodology, geography and component indicators that have occurred between different versions of the Indices. Therefore, some of the observed changes in this blog may be due to changes to the measurement approach introduced in 2025.

 

Rhyl North remains the most deprived neighbourhood in Wales

The table below shows the 20 most deprived LSOAs in Wales in WIMD 2025. Rhyl North (Denbighshire 004E) remains the most deprived neighbourhood in Wales, having also ranked lowest in the 2019 WIMD.

More broadly, the most deprived neighbourhoods are highly concentrated in a small number of places, with Rhyl, Ely, Penderry and Townhill each appearing multiple times in the top 20. These communities are largely located in urban and post-industrial areas, particularly in South Wales and along the North Wales coast.

Area name Unitary authority WIMD 2025 rank
Rhyl North 004E Denbighshire 1
Caerphilly East 022E Caerphilly 2
Ely East 039E Cardiff 3
Caerau 001A Bridgend 4
Rhyl South West 006B Denbighshire 5
St Mellons West 013D Cardiff 6
Caia Park 010C Wrexham 7
Ely East 039B Cardiff 8
Rhyl North 004D Denbighshire 9
Rhyl North 004F Denbighshire 10
Penderry 011A Swansea 11
Rhymney, Pontlottyn & Abertysswg 001E Caerphilly 12
Penderry 011C Swansea 13
Hirwaun & Rhigos 001E Rhondda Cynon Taf 14
Glyncorrwg & Blaengwynfi 011B Neath Port Talbot 15
Gurnos, Trefechan & Pontsticill 008D Merthyr Tydfil 16
Ely East 039D Cardiff 17
Caerau East 041A Cardiff 18
Townhill 019B Swansea 19
Townhill 019C Swansea 20

 

Persistent deprivation remains concentrated in South Wales

The map below shows the overall WIMD rank at LSOA level across Wales, with neighbourhoods shaded from the most deprived (dark red) to least deprived (green). Overlaid in black are the LSOAs that have remained in the top 10% most deprived in both the 2019 and 2025 WIMD releases, highlighting areas where deprivation has been particularly consistent over time.

Of the 191 LSOAs in the 10% most deprived nationally, 165 (86.4%) have remained in this group across both the 2019 and 2025 WIMD releases. The largest clusters of persistently deprived LSOAs are found in South Wales, particularly across parts of the South Wales valleys, the larger cities and coastal towns. In these locations, multiple neighbouring LSOAs have remained among the most deprived in Wales, highlighting the long-standing nature of disadvantage in these communities.

Smaller but still notable clusters also appear in parts of North Wales, often centered around coastal towns rather than rural hinterlands. This reinforces the pattern seen in previous WIMD releases: while deprivation exists across Wales, the most persistent forms tend to be concentrated in coastal, urban and post-industrial areas.

By contrast, large parts of rural Wales, particularly in mid and West Wales, show relatively few LSOAs that have remained in the top 10% most deprived across both iterations. This does not mean these areas are free from deprivation, but rather that deprivation in rural areas is more likely to fluctuate in relative terms or to be driven in specific domains (such as Access to Services) rather than appearing consistently among the most deprived overall.

 

Nearly one in five neighbourhoods in Blaenau Gwent are among the most deprived in Wales

The chart below shows the proportion of each unitary authority’s LSOAs that fall within the 10% most deprived nationally, again highlighting how unevenly deprivation is distributed across Wales. In Blaenau Gwent, almost one in five LSOAs (19.6%) fall within the most deprived decile – nearly double the national benchmark of 10%. Newport (18.0%) and Cardiff (17.0%) also show particularly high concentrations, alongside Neath Port Talbot and Merthyr Tydfil, where around one in six neighbourhoods are among the most deprived. 

In contrast, only one LSOA in both Ceredigion and Powys falls within the most deprived 10%, accounting for 2.2% and 1.3% of LSOAs respectively.

 

New entries to the top 10% reflect deepening pressure, not sudden change

The table below shows the LSOAs that have entered the top 10% most deprived in 2025 but were not in this group in 2019. These neighbourhoods were not starting from a position of low deprivation – all were already relatively deprived in 2019, typically ranked between 200 and 300 nationally, but have since fallen further behind other areas in Wales. Several have experienced particularly large relative declines, in some cases dropping well over 100 places in the ranking. This points to intensifying deprivation rather than short-term fluctuation.

Area name Unitary authority 2019 rank 2025 rank
Mold 016F Flintshire 295 88
Glyncorrwg & Blaengwynfi 011D Neath Port Talbot 210 103
Rassau & Beaufort 001B Blaenau Gwent 235 105
Barry Island 015E The Vale of Glamorgan 216 120
Penderry 011D Swansea 201 124
Llanedeyrn 017B Cardiff 218 126
Bettws 003B Newport 204 133
Gibbonsdown 007F The Vale of Glamorgan 253 135
Morriston South 008E Swansea 205 142
Rassau & Beaufort 001E Blaenau Gwent 211 148
Neath South 012C Neath Port Talbot 199 151
Gibbonsdown 007C The Vale of Glamorgan 291 155
Cockett 017B Swansea 229 156
Newbridge 010B Caerphilly 214 162
Neath South 012A Neath Port Talbot 221 163
West Pontnewydd & Thornhill 009D Torfaen 259 170
Abersychan 002B Torfaen 197 175
Oakdale & Pen-twyn 006C Caerphilly 251 177
Bangor South 002D Gwynedd 300 178
Holyhead 003F Isle of Anglesey 316 182
Milford Haven West 012D Pembrokeshire 254 184
Connah’s Quay North 007D Flintshire 225 185
Caerau West 045C Cardiff 234 186
Tonypandy East 018A Rhondda Cynon Taf 262 187
Sirhowy 003E Blaenau Gwent 217 188
Ravenhill 013C Swansea 207 191

 

Many of the neighbourhoods entering the top 10% in 2025 are located alongside areas that have been persistently deprived across successive WIMD releases, suggesting that deprivation is spreading within the same towns and cities rather than appearing in entirely new locations. This is particularly evident in South Wales, where new entries in Swansea (including Penderry, Ravenhill and Cockett) sit within wider clusters of long-standing deprivation, while areas such as Glyncorrwg & Blaengwynfi in Neath Port Talbot and Rassau & Beaufort in Blaenau Gwent reinforce established Valleys patterns. Similar dynamics can be seen in Barry in the Vale of Glamorgan and in towns such as Mold and Connah’s Quay in Flintshire. 

While these neighbourhoods have crossed into the most deprived decile, other areas have experienced large changes in rank without reaching this threshold.

 

Some of the largest increases in deprivation are seen in Cardiff and the Vale of Glamorgan

Looking across the full distribution of WIMD ranks, some neighbourhoods have experienced particularly large shifts since 2019.

The table below shows the 10 LSOAs that have seen the largest decline in WIMD rank since 2019, indicating a worsening relative position compared to other areas in Wales.

These declines are spread across a range of authorities, but several are located in Cardiff and the Vale of Glamorgan, as well as coastal and market town areas in Gwynedd and Pembrokeshire. This suggests that some of the largest relative deteriorations are occurring outside the areas traditionally associated with the very highest deprivation.

Area name Unitary authority 2019 rank 2025 rank Change
Cardiff Bay 048E Cardiff 1,648 715 -933
Rhoose & Airport 014G Vale of Glamorgan 1,493 814 -679
Llanishen 005F Cardiff 1,511 954 -557
Pwllheli & Morfa Nefyn 012C Gwynedd 1,481 946 -535
Haverfordwest North 005B Pembrokeshire 1,311 790 -521
Cardiff Bay 048C Cardiff 1,707 1,192 -515
Rhoose & Airport 014F The Vale of Glamorgan 1,569 1,076 -493
Bryn-cae & Llanharan 029E Rhondda Cynon Taf 1,371 885 -486
Peterston-super-Ely & Wenvoe 003D The Vale of Glamorgan 1,692 1,210 -482
Pwllheli & Morfa Nefyn 012B Gwynedd 1,574 1,098 -476

 

Some of the largest decreases in deprivation are seen in Newport

The table below shows the 10 LSOAs with the largest improvements in rank, indicating a relative move away from deprivation compared to other neighbourhoods.

Many of the largest improvements in relative deprivation are concentrated within a small number of local authorities, most notably Newport, where several neighbourhoods have moved up the WIMD rankings since 2019. This clustering suggests that change is often happening within specific towns and cities, rather than evenly across wider regions. However, these movements occur largely outside the most deprived decile, reinforcing the entrenchment of deprivation at the very bottom of the rankings.

Area name Unitary authority 2019 rank 2025 rank Change
Duffryn & Maesglas 019E Newport 712 1,571 859
Barry Island 015F Vale of Glamorgan 801 1,426 625
Canton 040F Cardiff 786 1,408 622
Monmouth & Wyesham 004H Monmouthshire 1,212 1,796 584
Rogerstone 009G Newport 1,249 1,815 566
Langstone & Llan-wern 004F Newport 913 1,469 556
St Thomas 021F Swansea 484 1,010 526
Pen-dre, Litchard & Coity 011F Bridgend 1,412 1,913 501
Holt & Rossett 022E Wrexham 1,384 1,872 488
Victoria & Somerton 013G Newport 778 1,264 486

 

These findings reinforce the importance of using data like the WIMD to understand inequality at a local level and to support targeted action – helping decision-makers focus on where challenges remain most persistent and where engagement and investment are most needed.

You can explore WIMD2025 datasets through our Local Insight Explorer for Wales through interactive maps at a range of geographies.

For more detailed analysis about your communities, Local Insight is an intuitive, powerful tool to support your work.

Local Insight holds all the data from WIMD2025 along with 1500+ other local level datasets to help you make informed decisions for your communities.

Book a demo with the team and:

  • Save time collating, cleaning and visualising datasets
  • Generate data for the neighbourhoods you care about
  • Build comprehensive area profile reports in seconds
  • Overlay your own data to better understand service provision and need.

 

Author


Featured posts

Decorative image with the text "Data and resources"

Resources and data

Pride in Place Explorer for Wales

What is the Pride in Place Explorer for Wales? The Pride in…
More

Decorative image with the text "Data and resources"

Resources and data

Pride in Place Explorer for Scotland

What is the Pride in Place Explorer for Scotland? The Pride in…
More

Decorative image with the text "Data and resources"

Resources and data

Interactive Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation 2025 (WIMD) maps

The Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation 2025 (WIMD 2025) has now been…
More

Case studies
Data analysis
Featured
Indices of Deprivation
left behind neighbourhoods
OCSI news
Research Projects
Resources and data
Uncategorized